As you explore more weave structures you will begin to hear the word “density” a lot. This can relate to how you calculate the sett or how you think about the relationship between structure, your materials, sett, and the hand of the fabric.
Calculating Sett Density In A Multi-Heddle World
To achieve various threadings in the multi rigid-heddle world involves cramming the slots which affects sett. To calculate the sett of a multi-heddle threading, you need to take into account this cramming. The density of the sett is expressed as a percentage of the heddle size. For instance, in the point twill threading here, you will achieve 160% of the heddle spacing or size. If you using 12-dent heddles, your sett would be 19.2 (12 x 160% or 1.6). Along the side of this threading you can see the various sett options on different heddle sizes.
Point Twill On Three Heddles at 160% Density
To calculate the threading density, look to a single structural repeat and the number of spaces, or slots and holes, it takes to complete this repeat. This is your “space” count. Then, count the ends in the repeat and add any additional ends that marry in the last space when you place one repeat after another in your end count. Disregard any additional ends threaded for the selvedge. This is your end count.
I find I get the most accurate results if I base my calculations off the back heddle. In the example above, ignoring the additional selvedge thread, there are 6 ends in the repeat threaded over 5 spaces or slots and holes. When you place two repeats next to each other, there are two additional ends threaded in the same slot as the last end of the repeat. The repeat is 1-2-3-4-3-2. In the same slot as the 2 at the end of the repeat, there is also a 1 and a second 2. This makes 8 total ends over 5 spaces. Divide the total number of ends by the total number of spaces, and you get 1.6 or 160%.
As discussed in the previous post, there is more than one way to thread any given structure in the rigid-heddle environment. If you can’t get the sett in this threading, you can reconfigure the threading, skipping more spaces to put more distance between the crammed areas. (This also applies to a single heddle world, but it is a little more straight forward to figure out.) In the threading below, I can achieve a 112.5% density.
Point Twill On Three Heddles at .75% Density
I can also thread this structure on two heddles achieving either 85% density or 160% density. A dizzying array of options. Notice how in the threading on the right, the 1 is in a slot and on the left it is in a hole. As a rigid-heddle weaver, I have the freedom to assign threading positions any number I like as long as I achieve the order I need. In the case on the right, I can place 1 on a heddle rod and 4 on a pick-up stick. In the threading on the left, I would place 3 on a heddle rod and 4 on a pick-up stick. You could also adjust your materials to suit the sett in your preferred setup, with brings us to our next look at density.
Point Twill On Two Heddles at Two Different Densities
Structure, Materials, and Hand
This could warrant an entirely separate blog post, but it relates to determining these sett choices. I often talk about sett in terms of open, balanced, and close. (In retrospect, “dense” is probably a better word than close.) I prefer these terms rather than assigning a structural name to each density, although there is also logic in that thinking. Twills do perform well on a sett closer/denser than plain weave, but that doesn’t mean you can’t use a variety of densities and get the hand you are looking for. How firm or supple your fabric needs to be, your fiber type and size, and how the yarn is constructed play a substantial role in making your ultimate sett decision. Any given yarn will have a maximum and minimum sett where it will perform well.To make these decisions, we often look to sett charts. There is another yarn-centric way to look at determining sett.
There is another way to look at determining sett developed by Thomas R. Ashenhurst, a nineteenth-century author who created a formula that is known as the Ashenhurst’s rule. In a nutshell the basic formula is .9 of the square root of the yd/lb give you your maximum density. It is popular among shaft loom weavers. Peggy Osterkamp, a beloved teacher, weaver, and creative thinker, summed up the method in this post. I encourage you to read Peggy’s post as she does a good job of comparing and contrasting the wraps per inch method vs. Ashenhurst’s method.
A new rigid-heddle resource, the Not So Rigid Weaver, has an Ashenhurst’s calculator on her site, which does all the square root calculations for you. She gave me permission to share this resource with you. The results of these calculations often contradict conventional sett charts, offering a wider range of setts. In Ashenhurst’s formula the sett range for 8/4 cotton is 9.5-25.
This calculation is based on shaft-loom performance. For the rigid-heddle weaver, I suggest avoiding exceeding 80% of the maximum density recommendations. The crammed slots can get too sticky and the crammed and spaced areas in the woven cloth may not even out in the wash, although you can use this as a feature. I also rarely find the lowest recommendation very viable. Peggy suggests, if you guesstimate your balanced sett based on your w.p.i., divide that number by .7 to get a number close to Ashenhurst’s maximum sett. As a rigid-heddle weaver, I don’t use Ashenhurst’s method as much as I did as a shaft-loom weaver. When you move into cramming you don’t always have the choice from all the setts, so I’m often choosing my yarn for my sett not my sett for my yarn. Sett charts offer me a safety range and I know there is some wiggle room at either end of that spectrum.
To see what this looks like in practice, here are three 2/2 point twill samples woven on three heddles at three different densities, using a similar size and style yarn—unmercerized plied cotton, 8/4 Brassard and 3/2 Beam.
2/2 Point Twill Swatching In Three Different Densities
The swatch on the far left is the most dense, woven on three 12 dent heddles for a sett of 19.2. It has a firm hand and lays flat, perfect for mats. When hung from the line it doesn’t bend, while the other two have varying degrees of suppleness. The swatch in the middle is between firm and flexible making it a nice hand for towels. It is woven on three 10-dent heddles for a sett of 16. The swatch on the far right is the most supple, woven on three 8-dent heddles with a sett of 12.8. This would be good for yarns that shrink a lot and wearables. I created a handout that breaks this down even farther. (Note: it is somewhat easier to weave a 2/2 twill on three heddles than two. Three heddles reduce the occurrence of split sheds. If you thread two you can weave this same structure as a 1/3 twill, which decrease the split sheds, see handout.)
I think I’ll leave it there for now or I’ll be writing an entire book on the subject, oh, wait, I am! Thanks for your patience as I work though this material and to the Yarnworker patrons for supporting the Yarnworker space. By giving you some of the theory sections in small doses, hopefully it will make it easier to absorb the whole.
In April the Yarnworker Patrons and I are going to begin to look at warping two and three heddles. Join us!
9 thoughts on “Threading Part Two: Sett In A Multi-Heddle World”
What do you mean by a split shed?
Which of the 3 sets would you say is best for a blanket?
Sometimes when using a heddle rod, pick-up stick, or multiple heddles the shed will appear split into more than two layers. Which layer you want depends on the structure and set up you are working with. I have a photo of a split shed at the end of this post. https://yarnworker.com/geeking-out-on-sheds/
As far as blankets, it kind of depends on what kind of blanket you want and the materials you are using. In general a nice hand would be somewhere between firm and supple, so I’d lean more towards the “towel” or “wearables” hand. This is where density + materials becomes a bit of a matrix and a little bit of sampling really pays off if you are designing something from scratch.
This topic is right up my street. For years I’ve been fascinated by the engineering of textiles, and I will happily construct a ‘no thing’ just to see how – or indeed if – it works. At the moment I’m trying to recreate old-fashioned English Aertex using doups, on a home made sample board. We shall see . . . !
Sounds fun! Textiles can lead us down so many interesting paths. I love teaching at a science and engineering school (New Mexico Tech). The students are so keen to see how weaving relates to their field of study, or sometimes not. Sometime it is just an escape from thinking too much.
This is such valuable information, with more and more people experimenting with weaving with multiple heddles. Thank you so much for sharing this
This article really helped me understand pattern conversion. Now I need some advice. I have a pattern and am using the recommended yarn. The sett is to be 12 epi. It uses a form of point twill that spreads it out a bit. ￼The threading pattern is, from right to left 1,2,3,4,1,4,3,2. It has that # 1 thread in-between 2 4’s making the number of ends/repeat 8 rather than the 6 in your example. If I have my math right the density, as I figured out the threading over 7 spaces, is 1.42. With and 8 dent heddle that would be a sett of 11.36 – slightly looser than called for. A 10 dent in 14.2 – denser. I could use the point twill you show above with and 8 dent and get 12.8. I’m not sure which way to go and how much different the 2 threading patterns would be. Thoughts?
This brings up a conundrum for the rigid-heddle weaver. We can’t always get the sett we need for our given yarn, so we may have to find a yarn that fits the sett.
The twill you are describing is a Rosepath threading because the resulting twill creates what one could imagine as geometric flower looking thing. The twill I’m threading here is a Bird’s Eye Twill because the little dots formed I suppose reminded someone of bird’s eyes. This naming convention, in my opinion, is not very helpful to the weaver. From a structural interlacement point of view, they are both evenly spaced point twills, that result in slightly different looks. They have a regular recurring sequence pattern to the point as opposed to irregular or broken twills.
What are you planning to weave? A 3/2 unmercerized cotton would get you into the ballpark of a twill with a supple hand in a 11.5, but may be harder to beat if you aren’t used to working with open twills and it would require a yarn that would shrink quite a bit. A bouncy wool would take up some of that space.
If you are just beginning your exploration of this sett structure multi-heddle universe, you may want to stick with the threading I have here and use one of the yarns I did, just so you can get a feel for how it works.
Not my first rodeo with multi-heddles though I’ve only use 3 once or twice.
The pattern is for a gift baby blanket. It uses an DK acrylic yarn and the shaft loom spec is for a 12 dent heddle. I really want to use the specified yarn as it coordinates with the nursery colors. The yarn definitely has some stretch and bounce back to it. A 6 inch length stretches about a half inch. My guess is is will behave more like a bouncy wool though it won’t bloom like a wool. The lift pattern is 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-1 to create a “wave” pattern on the cloth. The pattern is the Garden Party Baby Blanket from Yarn Barn of Kansas.
I set up both patterns side by side in WeaveIt software, they look similar with the rose path being slightly taller peak and wider triangle. I’m guessing when finished it won’t look a whole lot different?
In a straight draw weaving order they will look much the same. You see more differences when weaving those draws as threaded. Given that you are going for drape and you have a bouncy yarn, I would feel okay with a sett just slightly less dense than the optimal. If you have a way to swatch it that will alleviate any doubts.
Comments are closed.